<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>it’s unix, not eunuchs &#187; mid-range</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/tag/mid-range/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com</link>
	<description>Howdy!  I&#039;m Daniel J. Doughty, and these are my geeky thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Sun SSDs Could Spell The End of Root Disk Mirroring</title>
		<link>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/06/10/new-sun-ssds-could-spell-the-end-of-root-disk-mirroring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/06/10/new-sun-ssds-could-spell-the-end-of-root-disk-mirroring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DiskSuite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encapsulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rootdisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid State Drives(SSDs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solstice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veritas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdoughty.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solid State Drives are on the way to Sun.  Some of us in mid-range computing have been dying for this development to come to prime time and frankly I&#8217;m excited.  Currently, most Solaris servers are using Solaris Disksuite or Veritas in order to mirror the root drive.  This provides the ability for the computer to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kclanparty.org/blog/2008/06/05/sun-announces-its-own-line-of-ssds/" target="_blank">Solid State Drives are on the way to Sun</a>.  Some of us in mid-range computing have been dying for this development to come to prime time and frankly I&#8217;m excited.  Currently, most Solaris servers are using Solaris Disksuite or Veritas in order to mirror the root drive.  This provides the ability for the computer to still boot and return to service, even if one of the hard drives has failed.</p>
<p>But if you had a SSD for a rootdisk, it would consume about 25% of the power that the current drives do.  Also, they&#8217;re much faster, cutting boot time in half.  And ultimately the most important feature is that they last 7 times longer between failures.  Statistics were <a href="http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-11408-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=39451&amp;messageID=725468&amp;start=0" target="_blank">taken from this post</a>.</p>
<p>Also, SSDs tend to not actually actually catastrophically fail instead they begin to throw more and more read errors.  This error rate would be accommodated for by any modern filesystem and would result in a minor slow down and an error being thrown to the kernel.  After enough gradual degradation, I&#8217;m sure Sun would agree that the drive is toast and then agree to replace it.</p>
<p>But think about this for a moment, it&#8217;s entirely possible that SSDs would become the defacto platinum spark plug for servers.  If a Solid State rootdisk lasts seven times longer than current rootdisks, it&#8217;s entirely possible that most Sun servers will meet their End Of Life schedule before the hard drive actually even fails.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to talk to anyone who&#8217;s had some hands on time with some of this hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/06/10/new-sun-ssds-could-spell-the-end-of-root-disk-mirroring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ars Technica launches a mid-range focused forum</title>
		<link>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/04/14/ars-technica-launches-a-mid-range-focused-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/04/14/ars-technica-launches-a-mid-range-focused-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledgebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdoughty.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell is funding one of my my favorite websites, Ars Technica, so that they can launch a new forum that will focus on the server room.  I&#8217;ve always liked Ars but they were a bit more engineering and gaming focused than I ever was.  They had a linux forum, but it was mostly guys just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell is funding one of my my favorite websites, Ars Technica, so that they can launch a new forum that will focus on the server room.  I&#8217;ve always liked Ars but they were a bit more engineering and gaming focused than I ever was.  They had a linux forum, but it was mostly guys just playing around with small boxes for projects.</p>
<p>Hopefully this <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080409-ars-launches-the-server-room-for-large-scale-it-discussion.html" target="_blank">launch</a> will help bring more people up to speed on what many businesses in America really need, good system administration, network design, open discussion, etc.  In fact, it may be one of the initiatives that address <a href="http://www.danieljdoughty.com/2008/04/08/threats-to-it-college-enrollment-increase/" target="_blank">my concerns</a> about the future of IT in America.  I just hope that Dell doesn&#8217;t overwhelm the environment that Ars has put together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always liked forums that award titles for participation.  Ars did this in the past but it was just based off of your number of posts.  But it did also mention how long the users had been a member of the forums.  The number of posts thing used to really upset a roommate of mine as he thought seniority or GPA or IQ or some other metric should be how everyone is measured.  But then again, he only worked for about 5 months of the year and never seemed to get along with anyone.</p>
<p>I tend to prefer forums more like HPs <a href="http://www12.itrc.hp.com/service/home/home.do?admit=109447627+1207886690665+28353475" target="_blank">ITRC</a> where you are awarded points by other members based on how useful your participation was.  <a href="http://slashdot.org/" target="_blank">Slashdot</a>, <a href="http://www.perlmonks.org/" target="_blank">perlmonks</a> and <a href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/" target="_blank">kuro5hin</a> have the same sort of structure.  I prefer these arrangements because they allow you to gauge how likely a person is to have the right answer to your questions.</p>
<p>Expert-exchange had something similar, but now they&#8217;ve taken years of good natured people exchanging information and now force people to pay in order to look through the results.  Needless to say, I&#8217;m pretty disappointed with their decision.  It&#8217;s only abated by the fact that if you click on the &#8220;cached&#8221; web page in your google results, you can still view the information.</p>
<p>Anyhow, hopefully Ars and Dell will have a happy engagement/marriage/partnership/whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itsunixnoteunuchs.com/2008/04/14/ars-technica-launches-a-mid-range-focused-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

